I seem to hear a lot of talk lately about "The Golden Rule" - Do unto others as you would have done unto you. It is spoken of as if it is an infallible rule - as if this is the type of rule that, if absolutely everyone followed, would completely solve all of our society's ills. I have a few problems with this. Overall, I think the rule is great, but I don't see it as a universal truth. There are many situations where this rule simply won't work.
For example, I would not want a masochist to treat me the way they would like to be treated. I don't see that as a very workable situation. However, one does not have to involve a masochist in the hypothetical for the rule's application to get dicey; the rule fails to measure up in many other situations as well. I know lots of people that like to be treated in a particular way, but their friends or significant others don't like to be treated that way. For the rule to work, it would appear that the two people involved have to be rather compatible in how they like to be treated, and there are tons of people that are incompatible.
Some have seen this potential flaw in the rule and have amended it to say "Do unto others exactly as the other person would like to have done unto them". This too is flawed for a couple of reasons. One, it's absolutely impossible for anyone to know exactly how the other person wants to be treated in every situation. Two, maybe the way the person wants to be treated isn't compatible with your needs. For example, let's say you meet a sadist, an abuser, an addict, or a leech. You may not be willing to subject yourself to such treatment and to continually give of yourself in such a manner. In fact, to do so would likely make you a rather unhealthy person.
Really the only rule that seems to work in every case is "Do unto others exactly as you feel like doing". You will never fully know how the other person would like to be treated, and you may be in a position where it would be very unhealthy for you to treat the person in the manner they wish. Hopefully, you will want to be a "good" person, both to yourself and to others. Either way, your actions will lead to immediate reactions as others treat you exactly how they feel like treating you in return.
Sure, some people may want to kill another person, or do some other equally "evil" act, and so, applying this rule, would go off and kill that person. Others would react to this act, however, with their own actions. In theory, it could lead to mad chaos where everyone is just out killing everyone, but sooner or later a collection of people would get together and form laws to prohibit such acts. They wouldn't have to, but they likely would want to. They would be doing exactly what they felt like doing.
For example, I would not want a masochist to treat me the way they would like to be treated. I don't see that as a very workable situation. However, one does not have to involve a masochist in the hypothetical for the rule's application to get dicey; the rule fails to measure up in many other situations as well. I know lots of people that like to be treated in a particular way, but their friends or significant others don't like to be treated that way. For the rule to work, it would appear that the two people involved have to be rather compatible in how they like to be treated, and there are tons of people that are incompatible.
Some have seen this potential flaw in the rule and have amended it to say "Do unto others exactly as the other person would like to have done unto them". This too is flawed for a couple of reasons. One, it's absolutely impossible for anyone to know exactly how the other person wants to be treated in every situation. Two, maybe the way the person wants to be treated isn't compatible with your needs. For example, let's say you meet a sadist, an abuser, an addict, or a leech. You may not be willing to subject yourself to such treatment and to continually give of yourself in such a manner. In fact, to do so would likely make you a rather unhealthy person.
Really the only rule that seems to work in every case is "Do unto others exactly as you feel like doing". You will never fully know how the other person would like to be treated, and you may be in a position where it would be very unhealthy for you to treat the person in the manner they wish. Hopefully, you will want to be a "good" person, both to yourself and to others. Either way, your actions will lead to immediate reactions as others treat you exactly how they feel like treating you in return.
Sure, some people may want to kill another person, or do some other equally "evil" act, and so, applying this rule, would go off and kill that person. Others would react to this act, however, with their own actions. In theory, it could lead to mad chaos where everyone is just out killing everyone, but sooner or later a collection of people would get together and form laws to prohibit such acts. They wouldn't have to, but they likely would want to. They would be doing exactly what they felt like doing.