Election Results

So, it turns out Obama is our new President. Did you know he's black? I didn't know because I don't see color. (I'm like Colbert.) I had heard some people talking but I try to ignore the gossip. Newspapers? You want me to read? That's just crazy talk.

I, actually, somehow feel really proud of my country even though it's completely messed up and greedy and I may lose my job and all of the rest, we finally elected a black man as President. It just makes me feel proud. Throughout history, it has always been a black man to break through a glass ceiling on big issues before women. (This was why I didn't think Hillary would be the Democratic nominee - it just did not follow the historical pattern.)

I am very proud that our nation took this step, a great step, towards equality. However, there is clearly a whole lot of work to be done. Obama beat McCain partially because McCain made several mistakes, the economy is terrible and Obama outspent McCain in huge amounts. It was almost like some sort of supernatural affirmative action at work, and I am glad that it all came together like that for him. However, it should not have been that hard. And we still have not had a female president. I hope I get to live to see that too. (Although, she may have policies that I will hate and I may regret these words in a number of years from now that is divisible by four.)

I hope this is just another small step down the road of true change and acceptance. (Although, based on the fact that all the anti-gay amendments passed, I am not sure we did not take one step back as we took another forward.)

Vote!

The Dark Horse

The day before I went in for my surgery, I stumbled upon an interesting Website. The site has a series of questions that you answer and then it helps you pick the presidential candidate that most matches your priorities.

The shocking part of all of this was that when I finished, the candidate it had selected that most matched my ideals and priorities in this upcoming election was Cynthia McKinney. My first reaction was who the heck is that? My second reaction was we have another woman running for president? How have I never heard of her? Oh, but the plot, she doth thicken, as it turns out that not only is Ms. McKinney a woman, but she is also black and she's the Green Party's candidate for president.

Holy smokes! I was completely blown away. How is it that not one single media outlet happened to mention this? They have been tracking this Joe The Plumber guy for days and learning everything there is to know about him, but a black female is on a national party ticket for president and I don't hear a peep about it? What the heck is that? I know they have the time. I know because all I do is hear the same darn stupid stories about McCain and Obama every single day. It would be nice to break that up with something new.

I guess it's only exciting that a woman is running for president when it's Hilary and Barack is the only black candidate that ranks. However, it sure would be nice if the people were informed of their other alternatives.

Extraction and Race

This is it, folks. The week I go in and my four wisdom teeth come out. I am really not looking forward to this, as so many folks keep talking about how miserable and painful it is. However, at least one or two people have said it was not that bad for them. I just want the pain to be short lived, and not to have a month of infections afterward - like what happened with my shoulder surgery.

I see quite a few bloggers I read are espousing the virtues of Obama. For them, education appears to be their number one issue. I think this is good. I think education should be everyone's number one issue, as one of the best ways to uplift a society is through education. On the other hand, I feel like finding quality educators and resources can be difficult. I think I feel dumber after reading half of whatever mainstream media has put out there, and I often think it is not just the inputting of facts and information into a person's head that is important, but also teaching them how to think and question and really get down and dirty with the facts. I do not feel that is done enough.

I also do not feel Obama supporters necessarily have the high ground in the debate. I think Obama is the smarter and better candidate. However, I have trouble viewing him as better or more honest. I have pointed this out before here. I was commenting to my girlfriend last night that I think it would be really awesome if a candidate decided one year to just be completely truthful and honest with the American people and the media about what they did and did not do and what their plans actually were. It would be interesting to see if the media picked up on this and there started to be some sort of contest as to which candidate could be the most honest. Instead of having to rely on factcheck.org to tell us what the truth actually is. The worst part is that I am not sure such services work.

I was listening to a news story recently discussing some scientific studies that have been done over the years and it appears the refutation of erroneous facts does not work. Hence, if someone tells you that the administration knows that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction or that the president's economic plan will save our economy, often the subsequent refutation of those statements with facts will not change the your original opinion. In fact, conservatives end up believing the originally stated erroneous fact more vigorously when it is refuted. This heightened state of belief did not seem to occur with non-conservative participants in the study, but that may have been because the questions involved were hot button conservative questions. It is unclear. What seems to be pretty clear is that once bad facts are out there, it is really hard to unring that bell. Perhaps we should institute fines on any political figures that deliver erroneous facts. It really seems odd to me that we, as voters, do not demand more. We get Obama and we are happy. Somehow it does not seem like enough.

Has Obama lied during the last two presidential debates? Of course. Has John McCain? Absolutely. Yet, we would like to elect one of these liars into our highest public office. Because "everyone does it". It somehow just does not feel right. What, liberals have the moral highground when voting for Obama because he wants to teach children? What does he want to teach them? If you lie well enough and tell enough people what they want to hear, you too can be president? It frustrates me that this is even acceptable. Not only acceptable but there are people so fervent in their support that they will wear buttons and T-shirts promoting their favorite liar. And make no mistake about it - McCain is no better. He cheated on his wife, inflated his accomplishments, omitted important facts and has done all sorts of inappropriate things. However, I wonder if Obama's record would be any cleaner if he had been in office for thirty years.

Sorry, I wandered off the path. I guess it is all of that wisdom still stuck in my head. Don't worry, though. They swear they will take it all away this week. Although, I hear it is very painful.

Come, All Ye Voters

Earlier this week, one of my good friends called me. I have been driving around with a huge bag of rice in my car all darn week so that I can give it to this guy, so that he can give it to Haiti (as part of his relief efforts). Hence, when he called, I figured he must be calling to schedule a meetup to get the rice. "Want to volunteer with me this Saturday? We need attorneys."

"Where would we be volunteering?"

"I'm not sure."

"What time?"

"I'll need to get those details."

"What will we be doing?"

"I don't know exactly. Something about felons voting."

"What?! Ok, well call me back when you know more and I'll see you on Saturday." I have a small collection of friends that if they ever needed me, I would drop almost anything to help them if I could. He happens to be one of them. For a period of time in law school, there were four of us who were completely inseparable and this still bleeds into our daily lives today. Granted, most of us now live at least three hours apart, but we are still there for each other as much as we can be. So, when one of these friends asked me if I would help him by volunteering some of my time, there really was only one possible answer.

Turns out I will be working with the ACLU this weekend to help convicted felons register to vote - seeing if their records can be suppressed or expunged and, as a result, become qualified to vote under the laws of the state of Florida. In some ways, it makes me a little nervous to be volunteering with convicted felons. However, at least with such situations, you know who to watch out for. In other areas of the law, you are never quite sure. I know one woman who spent years practicing real estate law in Florida, with an emphasis in home owners association regulation. She said she eventually started doing criminal defense because it felt much safer and she did not have to worry about as many stray bullets.

Bad Topics

We are not allowed to talk about the 17 year old impregnated daughter of McCain's running mate, Sarah Palin. I am told it is an off-limits topic, as how a family chooses to deal with such an event is personal. Unfortunately, the conservative position (and in this case Sarah Palin's position) of advocating abstinence only education, makes it a completely relevant topic. The fact that the nominee's daughter (Bristol) is pregnant seems to undercut the position that abstinence only education keeps children from having premarital sex. After all, if they ever happen to hear about condoms, they are all going to go crazy and start fornicating like rabbits. It is a tough situation because you do not want to have the daughter thrown into this political turmoil and quite honestly, I do not think she needs to be. What should be up for discussion is whether or not the candidate's position on abstinence only education works and I think you can address this issue without involving Bristol too much.

This weekend, I was at dinner with my friend and his mother. My friend's mother is a Democrat and her husband is a Republican. However, it sounded like she had decided that she may vote for McCain because he had picked a woman as his running mate. Something about this is disturbing to me because it is just reverse discrimination. Once again, we are not measuring a person for their own individual qualities that make them unique, but simply the immutable ones over which they have no control. If you put a male running mate with McCain with the exact same ideas as Palin, you would not find this woman voting for McCain, but because it is a woman, suddenly it makes McCain a viable option. I have the same problem with people voting for Obama because he is black. Granted, some black people may vote for him with the belief that he uniquely understands the black experience in a way no white person ever could (and the same goes for women voting for Palin and the female experience). However, it seems to me that one should really want to vote for the person that is most qualified and that has the plans that are most like what you want to see happen when the person is elected.

This is why I am completely disappointed with my choices this year, as neither candidate has very good positions in my opinion on most of the issues. And I fail to find either of them to be very qualified. McCain is an old man that is for sale to the highest bidder, in my opinion. It pains me because I liked McCain when he ran last time, but after watching him over the last seven years, I am really disappointed in him. Add to this the idea of electing a 72 year old man and having the real possibility that he could have medical problems and end up leaving the country in the hands of a woman that has never had the job of running a diverse society with over 1,000,000 people and no foreign policy experience, greatly concerns me. When I go to have surgery performed, I want someone that has done it multiple times and done it well. I would think when I go and select my next leader, I would want similar qualifications. I also do not agree with most of McCain's positions. Obama is largely untested. Sure, he can speak nicely but some of his positions lack real substance and some of them (like health care) are not anticipated to have any real impact for many Americans. I looked at other party's candidates but was even more disappointed with them, as many of them have incomprehensible positions or lack any clear position on anything except their key issue - like the environment for the Green Party.

I really would like to be excited for the upcoming elections, but I still have trouble finding someone that truly seems qualified. I guess maybe we should just not talk about it.

Not Enough

As you all have probably heard, Ted Stevens was indicted for receiving $250,000 in gifts from and oil company and not reporting them. They would have tried to indict him for bribery, but it's harder to prove intent with bribery than to simply show utter failure to report gifts. Personally, I have no problem with the man being indicted, but it really does not feel like enough. How many members of Congress accept "donations" and "gifts" from huge and not so huge corporations and rich individuals? I would hazard a guess that the majority of them do. After all, that is how you get elected, right? That is what I always hear - Congress cannot get anything done because they are always too busy fundraising to win the next election. That doesn't sound good. Why do we have such a policy?

I would think we would want some of the most important people in our nation focusing on actual work rather than how they are going to raise enough money or which political segment of the population they have to please to get enough money to win the office. There always seems to be a lot of strife and polarization in politics. The Republicans vote one way and Democrats the other, but I wonder how much of that is owing to each side's need for cash and which donors they are trying to please with their votes. If it's the latter then perhaps our system is just completely fractured.

There must be a way where we could structure our elections system where not so much fundraising was necessary. Maybe we could allocate so much money to each of candidate from tax revenue and that's all they can use. We could make it more like a board game where each player gets so much cash to use and that's it. Then they could stop worrying about how they will raise enough money to run. Not only that, it might allow more less affluent people to run - people that actually know what it's like to live on under $100,000 per year in our country.

It already is like a game now - a bigger more complex game where everyone is always promising campaign finance reform but no one ever actually closes the loopholes. One year they get money through one way and the next year, another. A never ending cycle. Obviously, our elected officials are not too unhappy with this current system. Maybe they like fundraising and all of their complaints about how they do not have time to work are fake. Maybe they just don't want to work. Nothing new there. I just do not see how this system helps us as a country. I am sure our leaders are making out on the deal someway somehow or they would change the laws. They are not trapped in the system - they created it. If they don't like the law, they can draft new law. However, I do not see how the bulk of this system helps the average American.

This is one of the reasons I have little to no faith that Obama will be the shining ray of light so many liberals have made him sound like. I don't like the idea of McCain because he really just sounds like Bush for another four years and I didn't like the last 8 years very much at all. Add to that the fact that before he was running for president, McCain had a very different message that he used to frequently espouse on the Daily Show. One that actually made sense. However, that message changed when he decided to run for president - I assume he needed money and the backing of the Republican party. Plus, the man is old. Really old. 72 years old. At the end of his second term, he would be 80. Eighty. That's old. I worry about that because a lot of my clients are around that age and I would not want them running our country.

When I look at the whole system and my choice of candidate it makes me not even want to vote, as my only real option is to vote for a candidate beholden to big interests. All of their money came from somewhere and my guess is it was from special interest groups, and it makes it difficult for me to believe that anyone I help to elect is really going to make any meaningful change to our country.