As you all have probably heard, Ted Stevens was indicted for receiving $250,000 in gifts from and oil company and not reporting them. They would have tried to indict him for bribery, but it's harder to prove intent with bribery than to simply show utter failure to report gifts. Personally, I have no problem with the man being indicted, but it really does not feel like enough. How many members of Congress accept "donations" and "gifts" from huge and not so huge corporations and rich individuals? I would hazard a guess that the majority of them do. After all, that is how you get elected, right? That is what I always hear - Congress cannot get anything done because they are always too busy fundraising to win the next election. That doesn't sound good. Why do we have such a policy?
I would think we would want some of the most important people in our nation focusing on actual work rather than how they are going to raise enough money or which political segment of the population they have to please to get enough money to win the office. There always seems to be a lot of strife and polarization in politics. The Republicans vote one way and Democrats the other, but I wonder how much of that is owing to each side's need for cash and which donors they are trying to please with their votes. If it's the latter then perhaps our system is just completely fractured.
There must be a way where we could structure our elections system where not so much fundraising was necessary. Maybe we could allocate so much money to each of candidate from tax revenue and that's all they can use. We could make it more like a board game where each player gets so much cash to use and that's it. Then they could stop worrying about how they will raise enough money to run. Not only that, it might allow more less affluent people to run - people that actually know what it's like to live on under $100,000 per year in our country.
It already is like a game now - a bigger more complex game where everyone is always promising campaign finance reform but no one ever actually closes the loopholes. One year they get money through one way and the next year, another. A never ending cycle. Obviously, our elected officials are not too unhappy with this current system. Maybe they like fundraising and all of their complaints about how they do not have time to work are fake. Maybe they just don't want to work. Nothing new there. I just do not see how this system helps us as a country. I am sure our leaders are making out on the deal someway somehow or they would change the laws. They are not trapped in the system - they created it. If they don't like the law, they can draft new law. However, I do not see how the bulk of this system helps the average American.
This is one of the reasons I have little to no faith that Obama will be the shining ray of light so many liberals have made him sound like. I don't like the idea of McCain because he really just sounds like Bush for another four years and I didn't like the last 8 years very much at all. Add to that the fact that before he was running for president, McCain had a very different message that he used to frequently espouse on the Daily Show. One that actually made sense. However, that message changed when he decided to run for president - I assume he needed money and the backing of the Republican party. Plus, the man is old. Really old. 72 years old. At the end of his second term, he would be 80. Eighty. That's old. I worry about that because a lot of my clients are around that age and I would not want them running our country.
When I look at the whole system and my choice of candidate it makes me not even want to vote, as my only real option is to vote for a candidate beholden to big interests. All of their money came from somewhere and my guess is it was from special interest groups, and it makes it difficult for me to believe that anyone I help to elect is really going to make any meaningful change to our country.
I would think we would want some of the most important people in our nation focusing on actual work rather than how they are going to raise enough money or which political segment of the population they have to please to get enough money to win the office. There always seems to be a lot of strife and polarization in politics. The Republicans vote one way and Democrats the other, but I wonder how much of that is owing to each side's need for cash and which donors they are trying to please with their votes. If it's the latter then perhaps our system is just completely fractured.
There must be a way where we could structure our elections system where not so much fundraising was necessary. Maybe we could allocate so much money to each of candidate from tax revenue and that's all they can use. We could make it more like a board game where each player gets so much cash to use and that's it. Then they could stop worrying about how they will raise enough money to run. Not only that, it might allow more less affluent people to run - people that actually know what it's like to live on under $100,000 per year in our country.
It already is like a game now - a bigger more complex game where everyone is always promising campaign finance reform but no one ever actually closes the loopholes. One year they get money through one way and the next year, another. A never ending cycle. Obviously, our elected officials are not too unhappy with this current system. Maybe they like fundraising and all of their complaints about how they do not have time to work are fake. Maybe they just don't want to work. Nothing new there. I just do not see how this system helps us as a country. I am sure our leaders are making out on the deal someway somehow or they would change the laws. They are not trapped in the system - they created it. If they don't like the law, they can draft new law. However, I do not see how the bulk of this system helps the average American.
This is one of the reasons I have little to no faith that Obama will be the shining ray of light so many liberals have made him sound like. I don't like the idea of McCain because he really just sounds like Bush for another four years and I didn't like the last 8 years very much at all. Add to that the fact that before he was running for president, McCain had a very different message that he used to frequently espouse on the Daily Show. One that actually made sense. However, that message changed when he decided to run for president - I assume he needed money and the backing of the Republican party. Plus, the man is old. Really old. 72 years old. At the end of his second term, he would be 80. Eighty. That's old. I worry about that because a lot of my clients are around that age and I would not want them running our country.
When I look at the whole system and my choice of candidate it makes me not even want to vote, as my only real option is to vote for a candidate beholden to big interests. All of their money came from somewhere and my guess is it was from special interest groups, and it makes it difficult for me to believe that anyone I help to elect is really going to make any meaningful change to our country.
